The higher this parameter, the more powerful and fast the videocard is. As a rule, all contemporary videocards feature several connection types and additional ports.
Knowing these peculiarities is crucial for avoiding problems with connecting the videocard to the monitor or other peripheral devices. All tests have been based on FPS counter. Videocard preliminary testing is especially important in the presence of high loads so that the user could see to what extent the graphic processing unit copes with computations and data elaboration.
Popular videocards. Intel UHD Graphics Intel HD Graphics Compatibility, dimensions and requirements Today there are numerous form factors for PC cases, so it is extremely important to know the length of the videocard and the types of its connection.
Interface: PCIe 2. Memory The internal main memory is used for storing data while conducting computations. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice?
Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider. Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics card Choose Graphics card 2 Choose General info Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Benchmark performance Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Overall score This is our combined benchmark performance rating. GeForce M 0.
ION 2 0. Intel HD Graphics vs. AMD Caicos vs. AMD Baffin vs. AMD Radeon vs. QHD x Horizon Zero Dawn Death Stranding F1 Gears Tactics Doom Eternal Stutters — This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates.
Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps. The achievable battery life of the Asus PN with 47Wh ranges between just above three hours under load and a maximum of 6. On its own, this is not too bad, but, typical Pinetrail netbooks can do much better. Following, we compare different devices in regards of their energy demand. Of course different displays, RAM etc. Nevertheless, a trend is evident.
Compared to other current devices of the netbook range, the Asus PN is mid-range in regards of energy demand. However, Intel's Pinetrail platform alone needs clearly less energy. The additional energy demand can finally be explained by higher performance reserves, e. As soon as Optimus is available for ION2 and implemented, the energy consumption in idle mode should shrink to the level of Atom netbooks without additional chip and the Broadcom competitor could be beaten in this aspect.
Still the power consumption under load will stay the same or even slightly higher as the GMA is running too. If you just consider the generic benchmarks, we'd give it the thumbs up. Especially in the current 3DMark benchmarks, the netbook test sample on hand can reach a level which formerly exclusively office and multimedia starters could accomplish.
The gaming performance varies depending on the settings and game. Even if the values partly highly fluctuate, at least the level of ION1 should be reached. In general the CPU is the limiting factor in the netbook range. In some games the ranking is inverted if medium details are chosen.
Overall, the Asus PN is hardly able to exceed the 30 fps range. So, running computer games, the fun is limited. However, combined with a more powerful dual-core CPU rumored Atom dual cores the next generation of ION could, alike its predecessor, ensure a satisfying performance in current games. Still, such netbooks are not even announced yet. Note: The weaker 8-core version of ION 2 for 10" netbooks will do worse, because it only features half of the computational cores and a lower clock rate.
Therewith the gaming performance will be lower too. Movies in p and p Full-HD videos can be smoothly played with the hardware on hand. But, selecting an appropriate software is crucial. It should support ION2 best possible. Online p and p with limitation videos, e.
The energy consumption does not differ much from the first ION platform. As a consequence Intel's Pinetrail netbook platform does much better in terms of battery life.
The later also allows a smooth HD-playback, but does better in terms of energy demand. However, if Optimus is implemented in notebooks to come, ION 2 will likely catch up. This is something, Broadcom and the Intel solutions cant do today and may save you a lot of time when converting videos for example. High DefinitION. Working For Notebookcheck. Depicted together with Optimus. However, our test sample did not have Optimus built-in.
Because of its age, it is somewhat CPU dependent. However, the GeForce M with the same core, but, higher clock rate does clearly better. However, a similar big difference remains to the dedicated G M. WoW in practice: to some extent playable with limited graphics settings. Anno Although Anno is not necessarily a multimedia classic, it is very popular. The following video ran at the settings mentioned above.
0コメント